Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
1.
Prehosp Emerg Care ; : 1-7, 2023 May 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2292483

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: EMS frequently encounter patients who decline transport, yet there are little data to inform the safety of patient and/or paramedic-initiated assess, treat, and refer (ATR) protocols. We determined patient decision-making and short-term outcomes after non-transport by EMS during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: This was a prospective, observational study of a random sample of patients evaluated and not transported by EMS from August 2020 to March 2021. From the EMS database, we randomly selected a daily sample of adult patients with disposition of ATR. We excluded patients dispositioned against medical advice (AMA) and those in police custody. Investigators contacted patients by phone to administer a standardized survey regarding decision-making, symptom progression, follow-up care, and satisfaction with non-transport decision. We also determined the proportion of patients who re-contacted 9-1-1 within 72 h, and unexpected deaths within 72 h using coroner data. Descriptive statistics were calculated. RESULTS: Of 4613 non-transported patients, 3330 (72%) patients for whom the disposition was ATR were included. Patients were 46% male with a median age of 49 (inter-quartile range (IQR) 31-67). Median vital signs measurements fell within the normal range. Investigators successfully contacted 584/3330 patients (18%). The most common reason for failure was lack of accurate phone number. The most common reasons patients reported for not going to the ED on initial encounter were: felt reassured after the paramedic assessment (151/584, 26%), medical complaint resolved (113/584, 19%), paramedic suggested transport was not required (73/584, 13%), concern for COVID-19 exposure (57/584, 10%), and initial concern was not medical (46/584, 8%). Ninety-five percent (552/584) were satisfied with the non-transport decision and 49% (284/584) had sought follow-up care. The majority (501/584, 86%) reported equal, improved, or resolved symptoms, while 80 patients (13%) reported worse symptoms, of whom (64/80, 80%) remained satisfied with the non-transport decision. Overall, there were 154 of 3330 (4.6%) 9-1-1 recontacts within 72 h. Based on coroner data, three unexpected deaths (0.09%) occurred within 72 h of the initial EMS calls. CONCLUSION: Paramedic disposition by ATR protocols resulted in a low rate of 9-1-1 recontact. Unexpected deaths were extremely rare. Patient satisfaction with the non-transport decision was high.

2.
Heart Fail Clin ; 19(2): 231-240, 2023 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2252092

ABSTRACT

The incidence of both out-of-hospital and in-hospital cardiac arrest increased during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Patient survival and neurologic outcome after both out-of-hospital and in-hospital cardiac arrest were reduced. Direct effects of the COVID-19 illness combined with indirect effects of the pandemic on patient's behavior and health care systems contributed to these changes. Understanding the potential factors offers the opportunity to improve future response and save lives.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Emergency Medical Services , Emergency Treatment , Heart Arrest , Humans , COVID-19/epidemiology , Heart Arrest/epidemiology , Heart Arrest/therapy , Pandemics
3.
Prehosp Emerg Care ; : 1-7, 2022 Aug 29.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2252737

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: COVID-19 has had significant secondary effects on health care systems, including effects on emergency medical services (EMS) responses for time-sensitive emergencies. We evaluated the correlation between COVID-19 hospitalizations and EMS responses for time-sensitive emergencies in a large EMS system. METHODS: This was a retrospective study using data from the Los Angeles County EMS Agency. We abstracted data on EMS encounters for stroke, ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA), and trauma from April 5, 2020 to March 6, 2021 and for the same time period in the preceding year. We also abstracted daily hospital admissions and censuses (total and intensive care unit [ICU]) for COVID-19 patients. We designated November 29, 2020 to February 27, 2021 as the period of surge. We calculated Spearman's correlations between the weekly averages of daily hospital admissions and census and EMS responses overall and for stroke, STEMI, OHCA, and trauma. RESULTS: During the study period, there were 70,616 patients admitted for confirmed COVID-19, including 12,467 (17.7%) patients admitted to the ICU. EMS responded to 899,794 calls, including 9,944 (1.1%) responses for stroke, 3,325 (0.4%) for STEMI, 11,207 (1.2%) for OHCA, and 114,846 (12.8%) for trauma. There was a significant correlation between total hospital COVID-19 positive patient admissions and EMS responses for all time-sensitive emergencies, including a positive correlation with stroke (0.41), STEMI (0.37), OHCA (0.78), and overall EMS responses (0.37); and a negative correlation with EMS responses for trauma (-0.48). ICU COVID-19 positive patient admissions also correlated with increases in EMS responses for stroke (0.39), STEMI (0.39), and OHCA (0.81); and decreased for trauma (-0.53). Similar though slightly weaker correlations were found when evaluating inpatient census. During the period of surge, the correlation with overall EMS responses increased substantially (0.88) and was very strong with OHCA (0.95). CONCLUSION: We found significant correlation between COVID-19 hospitalizations and the frequency of EMS responses for time-sensitive emergencies in this regional EMS system. EMS systems should consider the potential effects of this and future pandemics on EMS responses and prepare to meet non-pandemic resource needs during periods of surge, particularly for time-sensitive conditions.

4.
Prehosp Emerg Care ; : 1-6, 2022 Jan 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2252736

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Subsequent to the Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) by the Food and Drug Administration, Gilead Sciences Inc. donated a supply of remdesivir to the United States government for immediate treatment of patients with COVID-19. The Los Angeles County Emergency Medical Services Agency (LAC-EMS) was tasked with the allocation. The objective of this study was to describe the process for allocation and the patients who were treated with the donated remdesivir in LAC. METHODS: LAC-EMS developed a strategic plan to distribute federal allocations of remdesivir to LAC hospitals based on the proportion of patients admitted with COVID-19 at each hospital. Criteria for treatment and its duration were based on the EUA at local hospital discretion. Data were collected on patients treated from May to December 2020. Variables included characteristics (age, sex, race/ethnicity), hospital care (level of care and respiratory support at start of treatment, ventilator support, total ventilator days), and outcomes (length of intensive care (ICU) and hospital stay, survival to discharge, disposition). We compared demographics of treated patients to the overall population of hospitalized patients in LAC. RESULTS: LAC-EMS distributed 34,250 vials of remdesivir in 7 allocations, which treated 5,376 patients. The median age was 60 (IQR 48-70); 62% were male, 59% Hispanic, 17% White, 6% Asian, 5% Black. Prior to remdesivir, 96% of patients required respiratory support including 49% supplemental oxygen, 35% high-flow nasal cannula, 3% continuous or bilevel positive airway pressure and 9% mechanical ventilation, with one quarter of patients in the ICU. Overall, 26% of patients were mechanically ventilated during the hospitalization, median 11 days (IQR 8-23), while 41% required ICU care, median 10 days (IQR 5-19). Median length of stay for all patients was 10 days (IQR 7-18) with 4,218 patients (74%) surviving to discharge and 80% of survivors discharged home. Compared with overall hospitalized patients with COVID-19, treated patients more likely to be male and middle-aged, and less likely to be Black. CONCLUSION: LAC-EMS's strategic plan to distribute donated remdesivir to hospitals based on the number of inpatients with COVID-19 resulted in the treatment of 5,376 patients of whom 74% survived to hospital discharge.

5.
Cardiol Clin ; 40(3): 355-364, 2022 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1944433

ABSTRACT

The incidence of both out-of-hospital and in-hospital cardiac arrest increased during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Patient survival and neurologic outcome after both out-of-hospital and in-hospital cardiac arrest were reduced. Direct effects of the COVID-19 illness combined with indirect effects of the pandemic on patient's behavior and health care systems contributed to these changes. Understanding the potential factors offers the opportunity to improve future response and save lives.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation , Emergency Medical Services , Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest , COVID-19/epidemiology , Humans , Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest/epidemiology , Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest/etiology , Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest/therapy , Pandemics
6.
J Am Heart Assoc ; 10(12): e019635, 2021 06 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1249490

ABSTRACT

Background Public health emergencies may significantly impact emergency medical services responses to cardiovascular emergencies. We compared emergency medical services responses to out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) and ST-segment‒elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) during the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic to 2018 to 2019 and evaluated the impact of California's March 19, 2020 stay-at-home order. Methods and Results We conducted a population-based cross-sectional study using Los Angeles County emergency medical services registry data for adult patients with paramedic provider impression (PI) of OHCA or STEMI from February through May in 2018 to 2020. After March 19, 2020, weekly counts for PI-OHCA were higher (173 versus 135; incidence rate ratios, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.19‒1.37; P<0.001) while PI-STEMI were lower (57 versus 65; incidence rate ratios, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.78‒0.97; P=0.02) compared with 2018 and 2019. After adjusting for seasonal variation in PI-OHCA and decreased PI-STEMI, the increase in PI-OHCA observed after March 19, 2020 remained significant (P=0.02). The proportion of PI-OHCA who received defibrillation (16% versus 23%; risk difference [RD], -6.91%; 95% CI, -9.55% to -4.26%; P<0.001) and had return of spontaneous circulation (17% versus 29%; RD, -11.98%; 95% CI, -14.76% to -9.18%; P<0.001) were lower after March 19 in 2020 compared with 2018 and 2019. There was also a significant increase in dead on arrival emergency medical services responses in 2020 compared with 2018 and 2019, starting around the time of the stay-at-home order (P<0.001). Conclusions Paramedics in Los Angeles County, CA responded to increased PI-OHCA and decreased PI-STEMI following the stay-at-home order. The increased PI-OHCA was not fully explained by the reduction in PI-STEMI. Field defibrillation and return of spontaneous circulation were lower. It is critical that public health messaging stress that emergency care should not be delayed.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/prevention & control , Electric Countershock , Emergency Medical Services , Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest/therapy , Patient Acceptance of Health Care , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/therapy , COVID-19/transmission , Cross-Sectional Studies , Humans , Incidence , Los Angeles/epidemiology , Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest/diagnosis , Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest/epidemiology , Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest/physiopathology , Physical Distancing , Registries , Return of Spontaneous Circulation , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/diagnosis , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/epidemiology , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/physiopathology , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL